1. The review of notes is more important than the process of recording
them.
2. Hartley & Davis (1978) find that students arrive at college ill-prepared for the
demands of a lecture
situation.
3. Catts (1987) finds that average students and above-average students benefit
from extensive and well-organized
notes.
4. Berliner (1971), Peper & Mayer (1973), and DaVesta & Gray (1973) question
whether low-ability students should take notes at all.
5. Research indicates that low-ability students who do NOT take notes in class
score better on "near transfer questions" (those involving retention of
information given in lecture). If the lecture rate is fast and/or the material is
unfamiliar, notetaking is less likely to be effective because the learner is
NOT
able to engage in the "generative encoding
process."
6. Notetaking services are designed to be a supplemental tool to increase a
student's understanding and gives an excellent means with which to compare
their notes. The service provides notes that an average or above-average
student may have missed. For poor
notetakers, the service provides notes that
contain important points of the lecture that the student may have missed by
trying to
write down everything said in a class.
1. 93% of students say Nittany Notes are more organized and , therefore, more
effective for
studying.
2. 82% of students attend class and use Nittany Notes as a supplement.
3. 54% of students using Nittany Notes and attending class say knowing they will
have typed, organized notes available to them allows them to listen more
attentively during
lecture.
4. The average notetaker's GPA is 3.5+. The average Nittany Notes user's GPA
is 3.2+.